Un trato, ¿es un trato?

Como cuenta mi amigo Luis Ernesto: Unión Fenosa se queja de que la administración nunca cumplió con el aporte que le correspondía para un fideicomiso para la ampliación de las líneas eléctricas en el interior del país. Y un contrato es un contrato, aunque talvez en Guatemala, no.

A los comerciantes de la 6a. Avenida de la zona 1 (los formales que tienen locales) Tu Muni los obligó a quitar los rótulos que tenían sobre aquella arteria (bajo el concepto de Centro Histórico); y a cambio el ayuntamiento se comprometió a quitar a los vendedores informales de las banquetas (que de hecho tapan a los locales formales). El resultado: fuera rótulos y quedan los informales…

Ahora la víctima es el ferrocarril, según esta historia publicada por el Los Angeles Times:

The Pittsburgh millionaire who spent $15 million to revive Guatemala’s once-defunct railroad said Monday that the freight trains would stop rolling Oct. 1.

His company, Railroad Development Corp., is locked in a legal battle with the Central American nation’s government, which Posner said has made it impossible to keep operating the money-losing service.

“Enough is enough,” Posner said. “It’s clear that at every level of Guatemalan society there is, at best, a lack of respect and, at worst, an outright hostility to everything that we have been trying to accomplish.”

Posner said the company would continue running trains to the end of September to meet previous commitments to freight customers.

The company will also press ahead, he said, with a legal action seeking $65 million in compensation from the government for allegedly damaging its business. Guatemalan officials did not respond to a request for comment.

Posner, 51, was the subject of a Times profile last month that chronicled his efforts to restore rail service to Guatemala, whose national railroad ceased functioning in 1996.

Posner’s railroad firm in 1998 won a 50-year concession to get the freight trains rolling again. It reopened a 200-mile stretch of track running from the capital of Guatemala City to the Atlantic port of Puerto Barrios, a feat hailed by train buffs but which never turned a profit.

Posner has made a career out of salvaging troubled railways in far-flung parts of the globe, including Malawi, Mozambique and Estonia.

But Guatemala has proved a tougher haul than any of them. Scrap metal thieves routinely plunder the tracks. Thousands of squatters have taken up residence in the right of way. Washouts ravage the rails during the rainy season.

But Posner said his biggest stumbling block in Guatemala had been the government. He claims that it failed to honor its agreement to contribute $3 million for track improvement and to evict squatters from the most potentially profitable lines.

When the company pressured the government to live up to its end of the bargain, Posner said, it retaliated with a rare and powerful legal maneuver to repossess its locomotives and rail cars.
That 2006 action is still tied up in court. But Posner said the threat alone scared off customers, sending his firm into a downward spiral.

In its suit against Guatemala, the company is invoking an investor protection clause in the Central American Free Trade Agreement, which includes the U.S. and Guatemala.

That pact forbids governments from expropriating assets of foreign investors. The railroad firm filed a claim in Washington last month before a special international dispute panel. A decision could take two years.

Posner said he finally concluded that nine years of spinning his wheels in Guatemala was enough.

“We can’t succeed in a country that doesn’t want us there,” Posner said.
Some say Guatemala might end up the real loser.

“The implications for foreign investors are not good,” said Carlisle Johnson, a political analyst and host of a popular radio program called “Good Morning Guatemala.” “Who is going to come in after this fiasco?”

marla.dickerson@latimes.com

Comments

comments

3 comments

  1. Miguel Arriaga

    Una de las funciones de un gobierno debería ser el velar por el cumplimiento de los contratos, es evidente que aquí por lo visto no se cumple, que triste.

  2. La victima no es el Ferrocarril ni su arrendatario, es el pinche PUEBLO, que teniendo una alternativa de transportacion, de pasajeros y Carga, sigue relegada al servicio pesimo de empresas de transporte de cuarta mano .Sabe que el problema del trafico vehicular se solucionaria con activacion del tren (a diferentes niveles de operacion) Ya Japon habia ofertado por ello, el problema es que la asignacion de los contratos y licitaciones se hace basada en nepotismos y sobornos.Los ‘tiburones internacionales’ en este caso tienen la peor reputacion y son solo BUITRES CARROñEROS o Piratas.

  3. Touché, Juan. Totalmente de acuerdo contigo y con Miguel. Saludos